IRONMAN® IM2004

Great pair of glasses, the

"Great pair of glasses, the style and fit of them are perfect."

— David A. (5/5)

As expected

"As expected"

— John P. (5/5)

Not as good ,,

"I've been buying IRONMAN readers for a while now. Seems like the last two purchases have gone downhill with cheaper frames."

— Michael R. (5/5)

"Great looks"

— Thomas (5/5)

I can read

"Great product. Keep two pairs active: one at home and one for the road. Almost like a song."

— Richard (5/5)

Nice looking but temples don't hold

"I like the way they look but the soft rubber temples don't hold them onto my head. If I bend over they fall off."

— GJ (2/5)

Solidly Built

"These glasses are solidly built but not particularly attractive. They were, unfortunately, one of the few options for cheaters in 2. 25 strength. They are reasonably well made (for plastic) and definitely take a bit of abuse. They just are very square. In multiple senses."

— David (3/5)

I would NEVER buy this product again

"Even when trying to pamper these glasses, the bows broke near the hinge. The hinges have very short tangs and provide no structural strength to the bows. Leverage, Mr. Designer!"

— Flag (1/5)

Love the readers!

"The Iron Man reader glasses are the best! Very comfortable and durable, thank you!"

— James (5/5)

Ironman 2004 frame is not an adult male frame

"Normally, I've been purchasing Ironman 2000 (IM2000) frames which are of the appropriate width for my face and eyes. But, the IM2000 was not available (out of stock) in a 3. 50 power; so, I ordered a 3. 50 power in the Ironman 2004 (IM2004). I'm not at all happy with the IM2004, as it appears that Foster Grant changed some of the frame measurements of the IM2004 to fit a much smaller person, perhaps a small woman or a child. The IM2004 is not an adult man's frame. The bridge of the IM2004 is 3 mm less than that of the IM2000 and IM 2003, which causes the lens PID to be less and way out of whack for my eyes. Additionally, the overall width of the IM2004 frame is 3/4 of an inch less than the IM2000 and IM2003, which causes the temples to have to have to be splayed out excessively, in order to fit the width of my head. I don't know why Foster Grant would lessen the width of the frame from that of the IM2000 and IM2003, except that I did see one customer complain about the IM2000 being to wide for them. Obviously, I won't be purchasing any more IM2004s."

— Edmond (1/5)